aQRateEducational guide · Borehole Logs
Borehole logs, explained

Every borehole tells a story. The log is how it gets written down.

A borehole log is the written record of a borehole: the strata encountered, samples taken, tests run, and observations made. This guide explains what goes into one, and why it matters.

Field technician at a drill rig recording observations on a ruggedized tabletField logging at the drill site — every entry in the log is a field observation, made once and reused many times.
BH-24-03 · conceptual record
Interactive
Depth below ground · hover or tap a layer
Data attached to this depth
Gravel

Dense gravel with cobbles, poorly graded.

USCS

GP

Sample

S-03

SPT

N = 24

Recovery

78%

Photo log
Lab result
Foundations

What is a borehole log?

A borehole log is the written record of a borehole. It says what was encountered, at what depth, what was sampled or tested, and what the driller or engineer observed along the way.

It describes one vertical location

The log is anchored to a specific place — coordinates, ground elevation, and a borehole ID. Everything in it refers to that one spot on (and under) the earth.

It is written during and after drilling

Loggers record strata changes as the drill advances, then add laboratory results and refined interpretations afterward. The log therefore blends observation and interpretation — in a specific, disciplined order.

It follows conventions

Professional guides standardize what to record and how, so a log written in one firm can be read by another. ASTM's field logging guide D5434 and soil classification practice D2487 are two common references.

It outlives the project

Long after the rig leaves, the log remains. It is reused for design, construction, litigation, research, and by future projects on the same site. A good log is an investment in everyone who comes later.

Foundations

What goes into a borehole log?

Six kinds of information, in an order that runs from pure observation toward interpretation. Explore each group:

Lithology

The core of the log: what the ground is made of, layer by layer, with depths.

Depth intervals
Where each stratum starts and stops, measured from ground level
Material description
Colour, texture, plasticity — the formal description of each layer
Soil classification
USCS group names and symbols (e.g., SP, CL) for engineering use
Strata changes
Transitions between materials, including if they are sharp or gradual
Moisture condition
Dry, moist, wet — noted with each stratum
Origin
Whether a deposit is natural, fill, or disturbed
Consistency / density
How compact or stiff the material appears
Rock descriptions
Weathering, fracturing, strength
Foundations

A vertical record of the ground

Hover over a stratum. Every interval is an observation, and each one carries its own attached data: a classification, a sample, a blow count, and more.

0 m (ground level) at top — increasing depth downward
Data attached to this stratum

Hover or tap a colored stratum on the left to see the structured data behind it.

This column shows the data that travels with each depth interval
Illustrative example. USCS symbols and SPT N-values are described in the next section, with links to the source standards.
Practice

How soil and rock are described

The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) gives soils consistent names and two-letter symbols, so a description written in one country can be read in another.

GW, GP

Well-graded / poorly graded gravel

Key tests: Grain size (sieve analysis)

Typical origin: River terrace gravels, railway ballast

Why it matters: Permeability and drainage behaviour depend strongly on grading

SW, SP

Well-graded / poorly graded sand

Key tests: Grain size, SPT N-value

Typical origin: Beach and dune sands, alluvial channel fills

Why it matters: Density drives settlement and liquefaction assessment

GM, GC

Silty / clayey gravel

Key tests: Grain size, Atterberg limits

Typical origin: Glacial till

Why it matters: Fines control whether the material drains or not

SM, SC

Silty / clayey sand

Key tests: Grain size, Atterberg limits, moisture content

Typical origin: Weathered sandstone residuum

Why it matters: Fines content changes strength and compaction behaviour

CL, ML

Low-plasticity clay / silt

Key tests: Atterberg limits, moisture content, vane shear

Typical origin: Floodplain silts, lacustrine clays

Why it matters: Plasticity governs shrink–swell and compressibility

CH, MH

High-plasticity clay / silt

Key tests: Atterberg limits, oedometer, strength testing

Typical origin: Marine clays, residual tropical clays

Why it matters: High plasticity soils shrink, swell, and creep the most

The reference standard is

ASTM D2487-17(2025)

. Classification always pairs with — never replaces — the logger's full visual-tactile description.

Practice

Field measurements & samples

The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is one of the most widespread measurements recorded on borehole logs. It turns a soil's resistance to being penetrated into a number, and delivers a physical sample at the same time.

1
Drive the split-spoon

A 63.5 kg hammer drops 762 mm, driving a standard split-barrel sampler into the soil at the bottom of the hole.

2
Count the blows

Blow counts are recorded for each of three 150 mm increments of penetration.

3
Add them up

The SPT N-value is the blows for the second plus third increments — the first increment is treated as seating disturbance.

4
Recover the sample

The split barrel is opened: a soil sample is logged, labelled with its depth, and sent for laboratory testing.

5
Interpret with care

N-values correlate empirically with density and strength, subject to corrections — they inform judgment, they don't replace it.

Method reference:

ASTM D1586/D1586M
Field logger at work: the driller calls the blows, the logger records them with depth, and the recovered sample is bagged and labelled. Photo logging the core or split spoon at the same time keeps the visual record attached.
Practice

One borehole log, many users

The same log gets read differently by different disciplines. Select one to see which layers of the record each depends on.

Geotechnical engineering

01

Bearing capacity of foundations

02

Settlement and compressibility of strata

03

Pile design depths (end-bearing strata)

04

Liquefaction screening (SPT N-values)

05

Slope stability parameters

06

Dewatering design (permeability)

Context

Data vs. interpretation: a chain of custody

A borehole log carries a mix of what was directly observed and what was concluded. Keeping that chain intact — from field observation to engineering judgment — is the whole point of good logging.

Stage 1
Observation

The driller sees grey, moist, soft clay from 1.2 to 3.5 m.

Stage 2
Description

The logger writes: firm grey silty clay, low plasticity, moist.

Stage 3
Classification

The material is classified CL under the USCS.

Stage 4
Testing

Lab results confirm the plasticity and moisture content expected for a CL.

Stage 5
Interpretation

The engineer judges: firm, compressible, keep footings above or raft on it.

The observation is fact. The interpretation is judgment, and judgment belongs to a qualified professional. When those get separated — or worse, blended with no way to tell them apart — downstream users lose the ability to re-evaluate the ground with what was actually seen.

Context

Borehole geophysics vs. conventional logging

Conventional logging records samples and tests at discrete depths. Borehole geophysics lowers instruments down the finished hole to take continuous measurements of the entire profile.

Conventional logging

Samples and tests at discrete depths

SPT, CPT, split-spoon and core samples

Visual description by a trained logger

Physical samples that can be re-tested

The default record on nearly every project

Borehole geophysics

Continuous measurement along the hole

Natural gamma, resistivity, caliper, acoustic and optical imaging

Reveals thin beds and fractures sampling can miss

Instrument-based, so it needs experienced interpretation

Common for hydrogeology and detailed rock studies

Reference:

USGS — Borehole Geophysics

. The two are complementary: geophysics gives continuity, sampling gives ground truth.

Context

How much of it is actually digitized?

Public agencies hold enormous borehole archives — Geosetta, one collector of public geotechnical data, reports 2,100,000+ boring logs from public agencies in 8 countries. But "digitized" can mean a scanned PDF or a structured, searchable record. The difference matters.

Florida

169,316 boring logs in this state's archive, split by format.

815

168,501

Structured, digitized records
Scanned PDFs only

Almost every log in this archive exists only as a scanned PDF. The record is preserved, but not yet searchable or structured — a human still has to read each one.

Geosetta dataset — counts accessed 29 September 2026. These are two example states from Geosetta's public archive; the full live table covers many more. Source: Geosetta — data by place
Context

Why structured data matters

A scanned log preserves information for one patient reader at a time. Structured data — where each depth, material and test is a field rather than a phrase — lets archives be searched, mapped and reused at scale.

Real example

Alberta Geological Survey borehole compilation

The Alberta Geological Survey publishes a compilation of its borehole data — hundreds of boreholes published not as scanned logs, but as a structured dataset. Each borehole carries its location, and each encountered layer carries its depth interval and description, ready for mapping, filtering, and download by anyone.

Real example

USGS GeoLog Locator

In the United States, the USGS GeoLog Locator lets anyone search borehole and well records by map area and download the digitized logs — an example of what becomes possible once borehole records are structured and mapped rather than filed.

The pattern repeats across the world: agencies that invested in structured borehole data can serve it to everyone instantly; agencies holding only paper and scans serve it one patient reader at a time.

Context

From document to data

The same five log entries, two ways. Toggle to see what changes when the log stops being only a document and becomes data.

BH-24-03  drilled 12/07/2024  rotary
0.0–1.2 m  brown SAND, loose, moist (SP)
1.2–3.5 m  grey silty CLAY, firm (CL)
S-02 @ 1.5 m  N = 12  recovery 92%
GWL 3.8 m (24 h)

Every fact is there — but locked in prose. Finding all CL layers across 300 logs means a person reads 300 logs.

Illustrative rendering of the same information in two forms — not output from any specific system.
Process

From drilling to decision: the borehole data lifecycle

A borehole log isn't written in one sitting — it's the product of a twelve-stage workflow that starts before the drill and ends years later, when someone else reuses the data.

01

Plan

Scope the investigation: how many holes, how deep, what questions the data must answer.

Stage 1 of 12 — every stage writes part of the log, or decides how usable it will be.
Process

The gap between a good log and a usable one

Each step of the traditional workflow works — the challenge is that they barely connect. Toggle to compare a fragmented workflow with a connected one.

Field observation
Written on paper in the weather, at the drill.
Disconnected
Sample label
Bagged, marked by hand.
Disconnected
Lab result
Returned in a spreadsheet weeks later.
Disconnected
The log itself
Typed up again in one piece of software.
Disconnected
The report
Assembled in another program, filed as a PDF.
Disconnected
The archive
A scanned folder — findable only by those who already know it exists.
Disconnected

The fragmented workflow

In a fragmented workflow, the same facts are re-entered at each step — from paper to spreadsheet to report to scan. Each re-entry risks transcription errors, and the archive that results is a document, not a dataset.

Conceptual comparison. The specific tools and degree of fragmentation vary by project and organization.
Principles

What good digital borehole data looks like

Six principles that turn a borehole record from a document someone once wrote into data everyone can use.

①
Captured once, at the source

Data entered where and when the observation happens — not re-typed from paper afterward.

②
Structured, not just scanned

Depths, materials and test values stored as fields a computer can filter — not only prose on a page.

③
Observation kept separate from interpretation

What was measured stays distinguishable from what was concluded.

④
Linked through the whole chain

Sample, lab result, log, report and archive all refer to the same underlying record.

⑤
Preserved for the next project

The dataset outlives the report that used it — findable and reusable, not filed and forgotten.

⑥
Attributed and accountable

Who logged it, who tested it, who signed it — a professional record, not an anonymous file.

Principles

Data supports judgment. It never replaces it.

A borehole log is a professional document. No tool — analog or digital — changes that.

The log records what one borehole found, at one place, at one time. Interpreting what the ground means between and beyond boreholes remains the work of qualified professionals.

Software can make the record structured, connected and reusable. It cannot decide whether the clay is normally consolidated, or whether that gravel layer is a channel worth worrying about. Better data makes professional judgment better informed — that's the whole claim.

Field observations are interpreted in context

Design parameters are selected by a professional

Standards guide practice; judgment applies them

Every log carries accountability through review and sign-off

Where aQRate fits

Where aQRate enters the workflow

Everything above describes the discipline of borehole logging. aQRate — a data platform for environmental and water work from Roshan Water Solutions — exists for the part after the observation: capturing it once, keeping it structured, and making it reusable.

Capture in the field

Form-based digital data capture replaces the paper log and the re-typing that follows it — observations are structured the moment they're made.

Keep the chain linked

Field entries, sample IDs, laboratory results and report sections all refer to the same record, so nothing gets retyped or lost between steps.

Review and report

Dashboards and generated reports read from the same data — the deliverable is a view of the record, not a separate copy of it.

Preserve for reuse

The result is an archive that behaves like data: searchable next project, next year, by the next person.

Where aQRate fits

The workflow, concretely

This is the same twelve-stage lifecycle from earlier — here's how it reads when the record is digital end to end.

01
Start from a template

A borehole logging template — forms, dashboard and report already defined — so the data structure exists before the first hole is drilled.

02
Log in the field

Fill the forms at the drill site. Each entry is captured once, as structured data.

03
Review on the dashboard

See all records in one place — every borehole, every layer, as data rather than documents.

04
Generate the report

Produce the deliverable from the same records, with the full chain intact.

Where aQRate fits

What you're looking at below

The next section is not a mock-up: it's a live, editable preview of aQRate's Borehole Logs Starter Template — the forms, the dashboard and the report, populated with sample records you can explore.

Forms

Lithology Log and Borehole Log — pre-built for depth intervals, strata descriptions, USCS soil types, moisture, and consistency

Dashboard

Borehole Log Demo — every record visible in one list view, filterable as data

Report

Borehole Log & Drilling Report — generated from the same records

Sample data

22 sample records already loaded, so you can see the structure in use before entering your own

Every principle on this page is a line of software.

Captured once. Structured, not scanned. Linked from field to archive. That's not a description of what aQRate does someday — it's the Borehole Logs Starter Template, and it's below.

Try it

Borehole Logs Starter Template — live preview

A working preview of the template: explore the forms, the dashboard and the report with the sample records loaded.

Form builder
Lithology Log

Borehole ID

Text

Sample ID

Text

From (m)*

Number

To (m)*

Number

Primary Soil Type*

Select

Special & Regional Formations-Type

Select

Gravels & Gravel Mixtures-Type

Select

Sands & Sand Mixtures-Type

Select

Fine-Grained Soils-Type

Select

Color*

Select

Moisture*

Select

Consistency/Density*

Select
Lithology Log
Borehole ID

BH-02

Sample ID

BH02-185

From (m)

15

To (m)

18.5

Primary Soil Type

Gravels & Gravel Mixtures

Special & Regional Formations-Type

—

Gravels & Gravel Mixtures-Type

GP GC - Poorly Graded Gravel with Clay

Sands & Sand Mixtures-Type

—

Fine-Grained Soils-Type

—

Color

Mottled

Moisture

Moist

Consistency/Density

Hard

Sample entry from the template

Report ready: Borehole Log & Drilling Report

Start with the Borehole Logs template
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The written record of a borehole: the strata encountered with depths, samples taken, tests run, groundwater observed, and the logger's remarks. It is the primary record of a subsurface investigation — see the sections above, and the field logging standards listed in our sources.

A trained field logger or engineer/geologist, often with the driller calling observations at the rig. Completed logs are reviewed and signed by a qualified professional before being issued.

The Standard Penetration Test drives a standard sampler with a standard hammer and counts the blows. The resulting N-value is a widely used indicator of soil density and strength, and the same test recovers a physical sample. The method is defined in ASTM D1586/D1586M.

No — and the distinction matters. A scanned PDF is preserved but not structured; a digitized record has depths, materials and test results as fields. The Geosetta snapshot above shows how different archives can be.

aQRate is a data platform for environmental and water work. Its Borehole Logs Starter Template applies the principles on this page: capture once in the field, keep records structured and linked, and generate reports from the same data. You can try the live preview above.

No. Structured data makes professional judgment better informed — the log, its interpretation, and the design decisions that follow remain the work of qualified professionals.

aQRate

Borehole logs are field records first. The best thing software can do is keep them structured, connected and reusable — so the next person who needs them finds data, not a scan.


aQRate by Roshan Water Solutions · This page is an educational guide; illustrative log data is labeled as such.